In her interview with Glamour Magazine, Kim Kardashian has come out to stoutly defend her daring stunt for her 2007 Playboy cover issue. She has , however, done so in a manner that it left the world searching for the accurate meaning of independence. Kim has told the magazine that she has always been the good girl of the family and posing for playboy magazine has given her independence.

Kim Kardashian had said that she has been living by a book till now. The issue is that after giving birth to a daughter, should Kim still pose for playboy or not? The question is, does posing nude the only way to express independence for Kim?

Kim Kardashian is not new to giving the world a peek into her naked body, be it through sex videos or photo shoots. Kim thinks that by posing nude for magazine, she is creating a memory for herself which she can treasure forever. Kim may be misled in thinking that stripping is the only way to get a high opinion about yourself. However, looking from a different perspective, isn't having baby with your boyfriend independence enough? She did get married before and ended it after only 72 days. Pretty independent if you ask us.

In using 'independence' in her defense for posing naked for Playboy, Kim has overlooked the image she would be creating for her daughter North to look up to. It is right to have your own stand on things and we are not denying that, however, does Kim should think about the repercussions it can have on her daughter, whose understanding of independence she is trying to influence.